Free Christian Education And Universities

     For FREE Spiritual Resources and Tuition-free Distance Education In Theology, Please Visit

Free Bachelor To Doctorate Courses In Theology, Bibliography, Apologetic, Biblical Archaeology, etc.

http://www.TrinityTheology.Org

http://www.ApologeticsCourses.Com

http://www.BiblicalArcheology.Net

The Loudest Abomination Ever

By Rev. Joshua A. Allegra

Loudest Abomination Ever-Recorded

"The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good- Psalm 14 v 1"

                                "And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient Rom 1:28"

Of all the sin ever recorded of man from primitive days of the Master's creation up till date, Macro-evolution is the most loudable abomination and blaspheme against the Creator by the creatures.
Posterity will surely laugh at our generation, of how the most learned and educated have been easily deceived and swayed away from knowledge by such unbelievable hypothesis.

Primitive men no matter their sin and blaspheme, under no circumstance have they rejected the facts that point to the existence of God. They knew and accept the facts that there is God and it is either they pledge allegiance of obedience to Him or they deny Him reverence on the grounds of pleasure for sin and satisfaction of their sensuality. However, even in their acts of disobedience, they know and accept the facts that there is God.

The richest King ever in Babylon made a statement when he saw and marveled at the works of God. After he threw the servants of God in the furnace and realise that they became four and on top of that they were relaxing in the fire as though an aircondition room. He said "Dan 3:29- Therefore I make a decree, That every people, nation, and language, which speak any thing amiss against the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, shall be cut in pieces, and their houses shall be made a dunghill: because there is no other God that can deliver after this sort". When Nebuchadnezzer saw the amazing display of God's power and in comparison to any power ever displayed in Babylon, he proclaim that He alone is God.

However, this wasnt the only incident that brought King Nebuchadnezzer crawling to the throne of the Almight God. In Daniel chapter four (4), King Nebuchadnezzar wrote a letter to all the subject and nations under his rule, telling them of the mighty work the Almighty God Has done. In the following verse  he gave an account of what happened to him.
" 31 I was still speaking when a voice was heard from heaven. It said, "King Nebuchadnezzar, here is what has been ordered concerning you. Your royal authority has been taken from you. 32 You will be driven away from people. You will live like the wild animals. You will eat grass just as cattle do. Seven periods of time will pass by for you. Then you will recognize that the Most High God rules over all of the kingdoms of men. He gives them to anyone he wants."
   33 What had been said about me came true at once. I was driven away from people. I ate grass just as cattle do. My body became wet with the dew of heaven. I stayed that way until my hair grew like the feathers of an eagle. My nails became like the claws of a bird.
   34 At the end of that time I, Nebuchadnezzar, looked up toward heaven. My mind became clear again. Then I praised the Most High God. I gave honor and glory to the One who lives forever. 
   His rule will last forever. His kingdom will never end. 35 He considers all of the nations on earth to be nothing. He does as he pleases with the powers of heaven. He does what he wants with the nations of the earth. No one can hold his hand back. No one can say to him, "What have you done?"


36 My honor and glory were returned to me when my mind became clear again. The glory of my kingdom was given back to me. My advisers and nobles came to me. And I was put back on my throne. I became even greater than I had been before.


37 Now I, Nebuchadnezzar, give praise and honor and glory to the King of heaven. Everything he does is right. All of his ways are fair. He is able to bring down those who live proudly. (NIRV)
     
The richest King who ever live in Israel (considered as the wisest man ever), King Solomon at the end of his research and accumulation of wealth and wisdom said, "Now all has been heard; here is the conclusion of the matter: Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole [duty] of man" Eccle 12:13 NIV.

King David, the undefeated and the most victorious warrior of Israel, once said concerning God. He said "For you are great and do marvelous deeds; you alone are God". Psalm 86:10 NIV.

And the greatest of all, Jesus, who is the author and finisher of our faith, the Godman so rooted in the history of mankind. The man who being a man left the most remarkable impart on the surface of the Earth and on mankind. He once said "The most important one," answered Jesus, "is this: 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one".Mark 12:29 NIV


Our openning Scripture warn as and state emphatically, that only FOOLS say in their heart that there is no God. Thus in many years to come, hopefully, when posteirty begins to laugh at this generation, posterity will consider all our accumalated knowledge in sciences, logic and philosophy as foolishness- that is because if upon all the knowledge and understanding accumulated we are still deceived by such an "Immaginative Theory" such as Macro-evolution, then we are truly FOOLS.

May God not only forgive the Loudable sin of the past few to this century's generations but may He also helps us stand and not be deceived by the deceivers who pursue many by the knowledge of deceiving science.
However, there is an absolute judgment for all those who saw all that there is neccesary to believe in God and yet deny Him reverence, their warning is recorded in the Scriptures, in Rom 1: 18-32.


This Article can be used and reproduce in any format providing credit and reference is direct to the Author.

Does Really God Exist

The Question "Is God Real"

By Rev. Joshua Allegra

www.pfsiblog.blogspot.com

www.joshuaallegra.knoji.com

I find your article or question very interesting and I am encourage to write a short article concerning your question. I will write simply by trying to answer your question in the simplest possible manner.

Question 1: If God is all mighty and powerful, then why hasn't he made himself more known to us, so we know for sure he is the real God?
Answer 1: God has already made himself known to mankind in every way possible, but due to your presupposition by which you search, you can't find Him.

Question 2: If I was forced to choose a religion on my death bed, how would I know to pick the right one?
Answer 2: That would be a personal problem that I hope doesn't get worse than that for you, I pray you make a decision before going to your sick bed.

Question 3: But I have been with moral character all my life! I may not have lived by all your rules, but I treated others the way I
wished to be treated, and caused no intentional harm, injury or offense to anyone else! Just because I could find no undeniable proof that Christianity was the right religion, or indeed logically correct, that gives you cause to reject me from your arms?
Answer 3:  The Concept of Christianity is not base on Self-Justification, but that man of himself is depraved, there is no self-sacrifice that can atone for our sin, not only the sin of been a descendant Adam, but the sin yyou just committed by denying His existence. Only His provision for justification is perfect and must be accepted without objections.

Question 4: Assuming the devil is writing these books, why hasn't God countered them?
Answer 4: God has given to mankind enough evidence and the self-will to decide that which to follow. God does not order
us about but present us with proof that testify of His undeniable existence and He is still providing that proof for the sincere inquirer.

Question 5: God is relying solely on good faith to keep us at bay.
Answer 5: Relying on Good faith may not be that bad, but the truth is that the Almighty God is not in competition with the devil, He knows the end from the beginning and has giving to mankind ample evidence, but most are blinded by their sensuality and worldviews from the incredible fallacies of the devil and the undeniable evidence of nature that point to God.

Question 6: I find it incredibly naive of God to think that we would not be swayed to the devil's side, when he is using the only thing we base our own knowledge on, facts, to disprove him.
Answer 6: A person with a true spirit of inquiry will understand that the concept of modern science in actual fact has not oppose the Bible account of Creation and Morality.You must understand that, in our world today, many people including you base your decision on speculations rather than truth. What is your knowledge about fact and so far do you have any undisputable fact which dethrones God?

Question 7: We judge everything else on facts, so why can't God realise this and help us out:
Answer 7: It depends on what you mean by fact, as long as I am concern, both Evolution and Creation are metaphysical system of thought employing science as proof.
And all the evidence provided by Evolutionist or Theistic Evolution are nothing but an Anti-Knowledge and specualtion or Immaginative Theory

Question 8: At this rate, most of the world will not reach his kingdom. Not because they believe in a different religion, but because God hasn't been able to prove himself to us by the only way we know how to prove facts:
Answer 8: If you should have a true spirit of inquiry, without prejudice, with thorouggh investigation, you would find that there is much fact and evidence pointing to the existence of an Almighty God. Secondly, you must understand, that modern science has been taloired to the study of matter, energy and atom.

Question 9: For something to be found reasonable, one must be able to experience it, or logically prove it:
Answer 9: It is a unversal axiom that something can never come out of nothing, it is also scientifically proved, that life comes only from life. Logically, you must ask yourself if nonliving chemicals, randomly, without direction or purpose can ever metamorphose into a living organism, that is Logic.

Question 10: Why can't he understand that a lot of us actually need proof of his existence before we accept his existence?
Answer 10: There is saying that a man is his word, that is why the police making the arrest always make the statement "you have the right to remain silent or everything you say would be use against you in the court of law". If you want proof of His existence, go to His word and not to His critics.

Question 11: We are walking straight into the devil's arms all because God would rather rely on us going against everything we have done to expand our knowledge by choosing his faith with no proof, than actually help us by guiding us toward him with science, reason, logic and experience:
Answer 11:  Have you ever thoroughly investigated the basic laws of science? This are Laws established by the fathers of modern science. Let me give you some Basic Laws that established the foundations of modern Science.

You have ask nine (11) very good question, I tried my best in giving you sincere answers,you have also been sincere in your questions. Now I want to present you with some facts and Simple Truth of Science and I employ you to sincerely make the time for thorough reading and examination.

Law of Cause and Effect
Anything that has a beginning must have a cause. The effect cannot be greater than the cause. A person is a living, feeling and intelligent being and must have been cause by at least a living, feeling and intelligent being. Atoms cannot be the cause of a continuing series of greater and greater effects.

First Law of Thermodynamics
This law states that the matter and energy of the universe are constant. In other words, natural processes of chemistry and physics can neither create nor destroy matter or energy nor explain its own origin or properties such as gravity and electromagnetism, etc.

Second Law of Thermodynamics
This best established law of science declares that all conversions of energy from one form to another will decrease order and complexity in natural systems. This is opposite the unproven claims of macroevolution which teach that atoms increased in order by random, chance processes from particles to people.

The Law of Biogenesis
This law confirms the principle that the effect cannot be greater than the cause. Lifeless chemicals cannot be the cause of living organisms. Science has proved that “life comes only from life” by experiments by Louis Pasteur and others.

The Law of Probability
The probability of just one specific protein arising by random chance shuffling of an ocean full of amino acids is no better than one in 10520 and thousands are needed along with an encyclopedic amount of DNA. Consider that the total atoms in the universe is estimated to be only 1080. Only atheists believe in spontaneous generation in spite of those odds.

The Law of Mass Action
This law teaches that chemical reactions such as amino acids com-bining to form proteins are reversible. The energy that builds them up will also tear them down (just as the Second Law describes).

The Law of Inertia
This law declares that an object at rest or in motion will remain at rest or in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. What was the outside force that caused the so-called Big Bang explosion and give us something out nothing?

Law of Angular Momentum
This law declares that radial motion as produced by an exploding bomb or the so-called Big Bang cannot change into orbital or circular motion or condense into lumps in space without an outside force. What was the outside force that gave us condensing, spinning planets and revolving galaxies?

The Fossil Record
The fossils are supposedly the historical record of evolution. But nowhere does the fossils in the sedi-mentary layers of the earth’s crust show an undisputed transition of one kind of organism evolving into a more complex one. There should be literally millions of them if macroevolution were true.

Evolution Requires Billions of Years
There is no proof that billions of years of earth history ever existed. W.B. Provine, atheistic evolutionist, admits:
“Most  of  what  I  learned  of the field  in graduate (1964-68) school is either wrong or significantly changed.”
In reality, all age-dating methods, including those which point to a young earth, rely on unprovable assumptions. For instance, how is Time 0 determined in radiometric systems? About 90% of all of the familiar earth dating systems give ages far too young even to think of providing time for evolution to take place.

I assert that the Theory of Evolution is not only a mere assumption and speculation but I also need the theor of Evolution the "The Imaginative Theory" that is because all Evolution ever present was nothingg but assumptions.
This is what a notable evolutions once said,  George Wald, Nobel Prize winner, writes in Biochemical Science: An Inquiry Into Life (p.42):
George Wald writes:
“One has only to contemplate the magnitude of this task to concede that the spontaneous generation of a living organism is impossible. Yet here we are—as a result, I believe, of spontaneous generation.
“There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution. The other is a supernatural, creative act of God. There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from nonliving matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural act of God.”
“I will not accept that philosophically, because I do not want to believe in God. Therefore, I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution.”

Notable Evolutions admit to the fallacy of Evolution, however, they choose to believe in this imaginative theory of evolution because they just despised the idea that they must one day give an account to an Almighty God.
Many Evolution are Atheist who do not believe in the supernatural, hence the supernaturality of God, but you and I would agree, that science wasn't develop for the studying and observation of things that are beyond the physical realms.
Thus it must be noted, that both Creation and Evolution system of thought are beyond the natural because they cannot observed by recreating the same situation and condiction, hence logic must be employed to decide between the few evidences provided by science.
Evolutionist must accept the fact, that Evolutionism is a faith system, that is because any school of thought that is beyond natural and empirical proof is a metaphysical and every metaphysical system of thought demands Faith to believe and that is why we creationist believe in a mighty and powerful God.

Sir Isaac Newton, creationist, and considered the greatest scientist of all time wrote: “This most beautiful system of sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the council and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being.”

Let me give you a brief history of the rise of critics and atheist (wrongly term rationalist) against the Christian Faith.

It has been noted that the last four to five centuries have been a time in history when anti-Christian philosophies and thought patterns have flourished to the full extent in Christian societies. Humanism, a philosophy in which man has been elevated to the position of God, is the philosophy of the present times. It is the foundation of almost all the present-day ways of thinking and education

Today very few people know that from about middle of the fourth century to the middle of the fourteenth century, the
Roman Catholic church (sects) indulged in a great struggle for ecclesiastical as well as temporal power. In this struggle they silenced, tortured, and killed millions of dissenting people. A revolt brewed in the hearts of people, specially of the thinkers in Europe.
Thus when the Reformation gave them the freedom coveted by all thinkers, they came out in torrents against the Church.
Since most bitter people did not understand the difference between the Roman Catholic church, the true church of Christ, and the Christ of the Bible, they opposed and rejected all of these things simultaneously. It was a case of throwing away the baby with the bath-water.
A word they say is enough for the wise, save your soul before you get to the sick bed hoping to have a change of making a choice.



This Article can be copy and reproduce in any format as long as the information of the author is preserve without objection. The Laws of Science present in this book was compiled by Dr. Jolly F. Griggs in the work tittled "Evolution 101" and the brief history was compiled by the Authors of the TGSAT text books, Dr. Johnson C. Philip.

The Theory Of Evolution

Believe In Creation Or In Evolution

By

Rev. Joshua A. Allegra

www.pfsiblogs.blogspot.com

www.joshuaalleggra.knoji.com

I was encourage to write this article after reading an article writing by an evolutionist and publish on Scientific American website. I include a summary of that Article here.

"... Accordingly, most scientist would have taken the view that human physical evolution has ceased.... Not only has Homo Sapiens been doing some major genetic reshuffling since our species formed, but the rate of human evolution may, if anything, have increased. In common to other organism, we (humans) underwent the most dramatic changes to our body shape when our species first appeared (evolve), but we continue to  show genetically induced changes to our physiology and perhaps our behavior as well."
                                                         (How Will Evolution Change Humans- by Peter Ward, 17/12/2008)
On personal note, I find it very interesting how the evolutionist are able to persuasively make use of 'words' with the intention of deceiving and persuading the layman  into their net.
Making used of words that have different meanings and applying them to their theories without giving explicit definitions to those words has help the evolutionist in exerting considerable amount of influence on the young minds in our society. Before we continue I would like us to give definition to the concept Evolution (a word with so many meanings), Mutation and Creation.

Evolution (Macro-Evolution)- , is the theory that the Universe, the Earth and Man evolved from nothing. This is to say that the Earth has undergone gradual changes and undirected (random) improvement. And that there are no purposeful design as long as the Universe, the Earth and Living Organism are concern.

"We reside on the surface of a small superbly crafted, autonomous self regulating space vehicle. Together with survival, conquest and death we bear witness to beauty, fragrances, love and music. Think about this. Mathematics, philosophy, springtime, depravity, farming, courtship, quasars, and bubble gum; all came from nothingness?, formed by chance...?" (www.creationism.org)

Creationism- is the theory that man, the earth, and the rest of the universe were originally created rather than randomly exploding from nothingness into chance existence.

Mutation- (genetics) any event that changes genetic structure; any alteration in the inherited nucleic acid sequence of the genotype of an organism.

In science there are six interlocking theories which are often referred to as fundamental to evolution:

#1  COSMIC:  From the theorized Big Bang of (estimated) 14-20 billion years ago to the (evolution or) generation of hydrogen gas into existence.

#2  CHEMICAL:  Gases (beyond hydrogen) and other higher elements evolving into existence.  In other words, increasing molecular & chemical order and complexity over time happening by itself.

#3  STAR & PLANETS:  Gravity, angular momentum, magnetism, radiation, and other "accidentally existing" forces coalesce (or evolve) the molecules (from above) that evolved into existence all by themselves into subsequent proto-stars, then later (over lots and lots of theorized time; billions of years) into stars and planetary bodies.

#4  ORGANIC EVOLUTION:  Life emerging from sterile non-life by believed automatic advanced chemical processes.  This has also been called spontaneous generation or more recently abiogenesis.  Life from non-life; again, all by itself; increasing complexity and at some point in time - generating successive replication all by itself.  Scientists today are using tax dollars to employ advanced, state-of-the-art equipment under expensive, carefully controlled high-technology laboratory conditions but this still hasn't succeeded in any way yet ... trying so hard ... all to show that life could happen accidentally, without much intelligence.  (That being the case indeed.)

#5  MACRO-EVOLUTION:  Kinds of life diverging and occasionally increasing in complexity through random processes down through time.  The theory is that single-celled creatures gave rise to (possibly) multi-cellular marine organisms.  Later fish evolved into amphibians, and then into reptiles which (possibly diverged and) evolved into the birds and mammals.   Over the theorized millions of years the divergent complexity of life in nature has (apparently) increased in order, numbers and magnitude.  Many of today's textbooks show lots of artistic illustrations of such beliefs.

#6  MICRO-EVOLUTION:  Structured changes within pre-existing kinds of life.  Heredity & Variation.  This one is scientific and is observable in nature.

It is important to keep all of these various definitions in mind. Perhaps some but not all are true and verifiable? All the above conmcept giving concerning Evolution, only Micro-evolution has ever been observed and empirically proven to be true, the rest are nothing but assumptions and speculations stemming from the minds of Evolutionist and Darwinist.
Thus, we are going to base our argument concerning Evolutions Macro-evolution and Creationist on Micro-evolution.

Evolution is a valid process (in science, business, or otherwise); creationists certainly agree with this - when it is directed or built into the design of things.  Certainly automobiles have improved dramatically over the past 100 years, but it didn't happen all by itself.  The evolution of the automobile has been due to intelligent design input, advanced engineering skills and management oversight.  If one just throws a bunch of parts together or puts all the car parts into a giant tumbler along with four quarts of oil and 10 gallons of gas and begins agitating the lot for eight months the end result will not be anything resembling a car.

Although the evolutionist give credit to Mutation and Natural Selection for been the mind behind evolution, true scientific definition of mutation has nothing to do with high complexity leading to Macro-evolution. Mutations are almost always harmful or (if not fatal) get reabsorbed into successive generations in any event. Inbreeding causes serious problems, not magical automatic improvements. Almost 99% all observed mutations are detrimental to the organism and only 1% are benefitial, we must understand that the word benefitial here does not imply transmutation (from cat into dog) but simply means that organism didnt die by natural selection, but survived yet remain in the some genus (life group).

The tautology in the theory of Macro-evolution is Natural Selection, according to them Natural selection selects the organism or animal that mutation has rendered unfit and eliminate the  genetically stable animal. Scientifically speaking in simple term, Natural Selection acts as sieve by which nature eliminate the unfit and preserve the fit for successive reproduction.
However, it seems to me that the evolutionist do not understand the difference between fit and unfit or maybe they have rewriting the English defition for those words.

The fossils are supposedly the historical record of evolution. But nowhere does the fossils in the sedi-mentary layers of the earth’s crust show an undisputed transition of one kind of organism evolving into a more complex one. There should be literally millions of them if macroevolution were true.
The Evolutions keep making their case by reffering to the Fossil Record as the prove for evolution, even though the fossil record has no date and no actual transitional form indicating Macro-evolution
They keep thinking that somewhere on Earth they'll find some bona fide transitional fossils. But while billions upon billions of fossils have been dug up over the years there are still zero transitional fossils that stand up to scientific scrutiny over time. The only finger on the fossil record is the Noahic Flood.

    With this in mind we can now pregress and make our argument, according to the evolutionist, life wasnt directed but randomly exploded from nothing in something; both logic and science made it clear that out of nothing comes nothing. Evolutionists know that they have serious problems with their theory ,so we are not going to argue whether Evolution is possible or not.

According the Peter Wald (the article above) "In common to other organism, we (humans) underwent the most dramatic changes to our body shape... but we continue to  show genetically induced changes to our physiology and perhaps our behavior as well." "
Since the generation of life, living organisms has seen several minor variations, yet this has not and never will it result in any observable Macro-evolution. The observable physical or biochemical characteristics of an organism, as determined by both genetic makeup and environmental influences, does not mean Evolving.
Alteration (mutation) occurs in the transmission of genetic code or the makeup blueprint of an organism due to known reasons such as repetition or pasting of a code on another code and, or by turning a blueprint information upside down, but this does not result int transmutation.

There has been several observable evidences in nature where the an organism looks very much different from it parents in colour, size and behavior as a result of the interaction of its genotype and the environment.
Thus, it has been observed that the environment plays a big role in the phenotype; humans greatly feel the effect of the environment on their physiology (size, colour) and the environment play a considerable role in how we behave.
Children are always influence by the play mate, the youth are been inflence by their peers and today most of the youth in the collages and universities are been inflence by their atheist professors.
At the end of the day the role of the environment in the changing of our behavior and has nothing to do with genetic reshuffling.
Fundamentalist creation believers go to collages and come back home as fanatics of Darwinism, Darwinist hear the account of the infallible truth of the Bible and become creationist and their genes are the same as it was before they change their worldview, no transmutation.

Consider this, we have different kind of cosmetic body lotions on the market to nourish our bodies (thanks to manufactures) and our women patronized this product very much, even though some are nothing but fraud. Using this lotions result in many changes to our body in terms of colour and skin reaction (soft, smooth and shiny), we also have drugs for breast enlargement, hips enhancement (i dont know how it is done), just to mentioned the few, at the end of the day we see several changes in our body shape, looks, size and colour- yet we remain humans, either beautiful or ugly (if there is such thing).
From illiteracy to literacy see several changes in the behavior of a man, even trained domesticated animals like dogs, cat and sheep do change in their behavior how much more humans.
Thus one writter writes "I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it’s been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books in the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has.
I live near a place called Piltdown.  You probably know that a skull was discovered there, and no less than five hundred doctoral theses were written on the subject, and then it was discovered that the skull was a practical joke by a worthy dentist in Hastings who’d hurriedly put a few bones together, not even of the same animal, and buried them and stirred up all this business. So I’m not a great man for bones.”

Scientifically speaking, not all changes in our body is cause by genetic alteration or interaction and not genetic alteration as mutation has ever resulted in the transmutation of a living organism.
Thus the idea that humans are undergoing dramatic changes in their behavior and their body shape as result of Macro-Evolution through minor variation is nothing but deliberate attempt of the evolutionist to keep their prey in their net.

What do you think would be the behavior of an old man from among the bushmen of the Kalahari, Nimibia, when he wakes up from anesthesia and found himself seating in a 5-star hotel restaurant in London or New York City, among white folks with green and cat eyes, surround by reporters from several media houses? I guess the evolutionist should tell us if that will also result from geenetic reshuffling

People from different part of the world exposed to different cultures, different schools of thought and having differing worldviews express different behaviors.
People in some cultures in Africa believe in growing fat as a way to showing their wealth in society, whilst others deliberately grow fat, others become skinny due to malnutrition and hunger.
In conclusion, we must be mindful of the tactics of the evolutions, their tricks in making use of words with multiple defition to deceive; we must understat that, as long as the only alternative to the Macro-evolution theory is the more and preferably sound Creation Theory, the evolutionist will do everything possible to discredit and to decieve.
Thus a well know evolutionist once said " There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution. The other is a supernatural, creative act of God. There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from nonliving matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural act of God.” “I WILL NOT ACCEPT  that philosophically, BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT TO BEELIEVE IN GOD . Therefore, I CHOOSE TO BELIEVE IN THAT WHICH  I know is SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, spontaneous generation arising to evolution.”

Watch as pray, majority of scientist today are atheist, they are in our public schools and in our offices, some are rationalist in our churches, exerting considerable amount of influence on the minds of our children, brothers and sisters- BE AWAKE, WATCH AND PRAY 


Much gratitude goes to www.creationism.org and www.answersingenesis.com for helping many to see the light, I also want to extend my heart most fervent thanksgiving to Dr. Johnson C. Philips at Trinity Graduate School of Apologetics and Theology and also to all student of TGSAT and to all my readers.
For More articles and Christian Lessons from the writer, visit the blog pages noted above.


This Article can be copy and reproduce in any format for the purpose of education as long as no changes are made to the authors information.